logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.02.17 2014고단3178
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On February 11, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor due to the charge of forging securities at the Seoul Central District Court, and on October 11, 201, the Seoul Central District Court completed the enforcement of the sentence.

[Criminal facts] The Defendant, who is the owner of Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government land B, was willing to acquire design expenses from the victim E by stealing the name of C and D.

1. Forging a private document;

A. On November 6, 2013, the Defendant delegated A with all his/her powers regarding the power of attorney and construction work in the “G” office located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, using computers, and the Seoul Seongbuk-gu Seoul Seongbuk-gu B architectural design and construction work.

“A person delegated” or “A” described and subsequently created in advance to C’s name.

C’s painting was stamped.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of delegation in the name of C, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

B. Around November 7, 2013, the Defendant entered “written performance” using a computer in the place described in the foregoing paragraph, “to waive the share of the Seoul Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B 1/5 within 30 days after entering into a construction contract,” and “D, respectively,” and subsequently created in advance on the side of the name of D.

D his seal has been affixed.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged one copy of the performance letter in the name of D, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

(c)

On January 6, 2014, at the same place as indicated in the foregoing paragraph, the Defendant entered into a standard contract for private construction works, “standard contract for private construction works”, “living facilities and construction of urban-type residential housing with a public mission”, “Seoul Metropolitan Government in the construction site B”, “contract amount of KRW 1,750,000,000”, “contractor D”, “contractor H and E” and then created in advance on the name of D.

D his seal has been affixed.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged one copy of the standard contract for private construction works in the name of D, a private document on rights and obligations.

(d)

The Defendant is identical to the foregoing paragraph on February 17, 2014.

arrow