1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On February 8, 191, the Plaintiff was an employee of Hyundai Construction Co., Ltd., who fell at the construction site and fell (hereinafter “first accident”) and was injured by “the first, fourth, the first, the first, the second, the second, the upper-hand alley, the upper-hand alley, the upper-hand alley, the upper-hand alley, the upper-hand alley, and the right-hand alley,” and received medical care until September 23, 1992, and was judged as class 8 of the disability grade.

B. On March 10, 2010, the Plaintiff fells from the container inspection (hereinafter “second accident”) and was awarded medical care until September 30, 2010 by the Company for the injury “Introspected salt, left-hand salt, left-hand salt, left-hand seat, left-hand seat, left-hand seat, and a tent.”

C. At the time of the second accident, the Plaintiff filed an application for re-medical care in accordance with the opinion that the pain and re-operation of the “component part of the family room” approved at the time of the second accident during the period of the first accident, and obtained approval for re-medical care on December 14, 2010.

While receiving additional medical care as described in paragraph (c) above, the Plaintiff applied for additional injury and disease approval to the Defendant on October 4, 201, according to the view that it is necessary to show symptoms of “the 4-5 invertebrate Corresponding” (hereinafter “instant injury and disease”), which was approved at the time of the first accident.

Accordingly, on October 17, 2011, the Defendant rejected an application for additional injury and disease (hereinafter “instant disposition”) from the Plaintiff on the ground that “the vertebrate chronism was due to changes in ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate.”

【Unsatisfy-founded facts, Gap 1 to 5 evidence (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply)

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that the Plaintiff’s instant case’s injury and disease (hereinafter “the instant case’s injury and disease inverteline 4-5 vertebrate”) occurred due to the subsequent change of the body and the decrease in the height of the body.

In other words, the emission frame is different from the general pressure frame.