logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2014.12.19 2013구단55096
재요양및추가상병불승인처분취소
Text

1. On August 22, 2013, the Defendant’s disposition of additional medical care and non-approval of additional injury or disease rendered to the Plaintiff is revoked.

2...

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 21, 2003, while working on the Geum River Medal Co., Ltd., the Plaintiff was subject to medical care due to occupational accidents (hereinafter “the instant accident”) due to an occupational accident on the roads that come back from a business trip on April 21, 2003, and received medical care on October 31, 2007.

After that, the plaintiff argued that "The vertebrate Zecule Zecule in spine in the 3-4th century" was diagnosed as "the vertecule Zeculecule in the 3-4th century" and applied for the approval of additional illness and additional medical care on August 13, 2013 to the defendant.

B. On August 22, 2013, the Defendant rendered the instant disposition to grant non-approval of the Plaintiff’s application for additional medical care and additional medical care on the ground that the instant additional medical care appears to have been changed in the state of departure unrelated to the instant accident, and there is no proximate causal relation with the instant accident.

C. The Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit without going through a prior trial procedure regarding the instant disposition.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, entry of Nos. 6-1, 6-2, and the purport of the whole pleading

2. The plaintiff's summary of the plaintiff's assertion is that the additional injury and disease in this case occurred in the 3-4 main sentence of the adjacent main sentence of the 3-4 main sentence due to the increase in the load since the plaintiff implemented the 5th main sentence-1,000 main sentence due to the disaster in this case.

Therefore, despite the fact that the instant additional injury and disease constituted occupational accidents, the instant disposition based on a different premise is unlawful.

3. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. In fact, on January 26, 2004, the Plaintiff carried out the e-mail and negotition expansion on the conical signboards between the 5th and the 1th 1,004. On April 16, 2004, the Plaintiff carried out the e-mail and the e-mail (the e-mail), the e-mail (the e-mail), the e-mail (the e-mail), the e-mail (the e-mail), the e-mail (the e-mail) and the e-mail (the e-mail), and the e-mail (the e-mail) on October 31, 2007.

arrow