beta
Text
1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. (i) On June 2010, the Plaintiff was serving as the head of IMB cell room room leader who entered the company B and stamped a furniture. On June 29, 2015, the Plaintiff goes to work at the above company at around 08:30 on June 29, 2015, and is working at the 2-meter fire storage.
The first medical care benefit application was filed after the diagnosis of the "the emission frame No. 3, the escape card No. 4-5, the verting vertebrate in the vertevis, and the closure frame of the left-hand frame" of the incident which has lost the center and fall down below the center, and the first medical care benefit application was filed.
On July 28, 2015, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the processing results of the first medical care benefit application as follows:
(그 중 제4-5번 요추간판 탈출증에 대한 불승인처분을 이하 ‘이 사건 제1처분’이라 한다). 신청상병 : 요추 제3번 방출성 골절(폐쇄성), 제4-5번 요추부 척추관 협착증, 제4-5번 요추간판 탈출증, 좌측 종골의 골절(폐쇄성) 관련법령 : 산업재해보상보험법 제37조 및 같은 법 시행령 제27조 결정내용 : 일부승인 - 승인상병 : 좌측 종골의 골절(폐쇄성) - 변경승인상병 : 요추 제3번 방출성 골절(폐쇄성) ⇒ 요추 제3번 압박 골절 - 불승인상병 : 제4-5번 요추부 척추관 협착증, 제4-5번 요추간판 탈출증 불승인 이유 - 요추 제3번 방출성 골절(폐쇄성) : 방출성 골절이 아닌 ‘요추 제3번 압박 골절’로 사료됨 - 제4-5번 요추부 척추관 협착증, 제4-5번 요추간판 탈출증 : 추간판에 심한 퇴행성 변화와 척추증과 동반된 퇴행성 병변으로 사고와 관련성이 낮은 기존질환으로 사료됨 ⑵ 원고는 ‘척수손상(제3요추부 신경근 손상)’에 대하여 추가상병 신청을 하였다.
However, on July 6, 2016, the Defendant did not find out for the Plaintiff a clear opinion of negotition damage related to the Plaintiff’s ‘MaRI’’s MaRI’s Mademculium No. 3, which is an officially recognized injury, and it is considered as a opinion related to the emuliative existing disease.