1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 23, 1995, the Plaintiff received additional medical care by September 6, 1996, due to occupational accidents, such as “the first phase of emissions from 1st century, both sides of the alley, and the left-hand subpathal paralysis,” due to the injury of “the first phase of emissions from 1st century,” and received additional medical care.

On September 14, 1996, the defendant judged that the function disorder on the spine part of the plaintiff's 12 plehion-2 in which metal scrap surgery was implemented, was judged as Grade 8, and judged as Grade 12 each, the defendant adjusted the plaintiff's disability grade to Grade 7, and paid the plaintiff the amount for 616 days for lump-sum disability compensation of Grade 7.

The plaintiff was receiving additional medical care from January 21, 1998 to February 17, 1998 due to the aggravation of symptoms of both satisfaction, but there was no change in the disability grade.

B. On September 5, 2003, the Plaintiff suffered from the injury of “the cage 2 cage cage cage cage 2 on the opposite side, the right 2 cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage cage c

On February 24, 2005, the defendant judged that the function disorder of the section of the plaintiff's left-hand hand in grade 12 was paid for 154 days for lump-sum disability compensation in grade 12.

From January 10, 2006 to April 30, 2007, due to the aggravation of the symptoms of the left-hand fingers, the Plaintiff re-treatmentd from January 10, 2006 to April 30, 2007. On May 21, 2007, the Defendant determined the Plaintiff’s functional disorder of the Plaintiff’s left-hand fingers as Class 8, and paid from class 8’s lump-sum disability compensation 495, the Plaintiff paid the remainder of 341 days after deducting 154 days from class 12 of the functional disability of class 12 of the left-hand fingers.

C. The Plaintiff received additional medical care from September 10, 2007 to December 31, 2009 due to the aggravation of symptoms of both satisfaction pipes.

On March 3, 2010, the defendant judged the functional disability of the parts above the level of 8 on each side of the plaintiff on March 3, 2010, and then determined the plaintiff's disability grade 8 on the vertebrate 8. The plaintiff's disability grade is adjusted to Grade 6. From January 1, 2010 on the day following the completion of additional medical care, the plaintiff is the lump-sum disability compensation benefits of Grade 7.