The judgment below

The part against the defendant shall be reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that this judgment.

1. The decision of the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable in its summary of the grounds for appeal.

2. The act of arranging sexual traffic does not have a significant social hazard, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, and in order to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments and to establish a sound sexual culture, it is necessary to cut off and punish them, and the defendant is employed by the head of a sexual traffic establishment as his/her office and is receiving wages of 2 million won per month and engaged in the act of arranging sexual traffic with F as his/her business owner. In light of the circumstances and contents leading up to the above crime, the method of committing the above crime, the method of committing intelligent and secret crimes, the long-term period exceeding one year, and profits acquired by the crime are deemed to be considerable, and in particular, on February 18, 2011, the defendant committed the crime at a military branch of the Jeonju District Court without being sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for a period of two years and six years due to the violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse.

However, in consideration of the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the court below's punishment against the defendant is too unreasonable, because it is against the defendant's depth through a prison life for about five months, there is no record of criminal punishment for the violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc., and the degree of participation is relatively minor compared to the business owner as the head of a sexual traffic business place.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is reasonable, the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 346 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is again decided after pleading as follows.