The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that each of the original judgments (a fine of five million won is imposed on Defendant A, and a fine of seven million won is imposed on Defendant B) is too uneased and unreasonable.

2. Determination:

A. In light of the following circumstances: (a) Defendant A’s act of arranging sexual traffic at the same place without being familiar with the former, repeated the instant crime without being able to do so; and (b) the content of the instant crime committed in collusion with the latter and the method of the commission of sexual traffic in collusion with the latter; (c) on the other hand, the Defendant has led to confession and reflect on the instant crime; (d) the number and period of the instant crime revealed in the records and pleadings; (e) the amount of gains acquired through the instant crime; and (e) other various sentencing conditions and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, happiness, family environment; and (e) the conditions before and after the commission of the instant crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

B. Defendant B’s act of arranging sexual traffic does not have a significant social hazard, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing a woman’s sex, and it is necessary to take full account of the following factors: (a) the employer who operates an illegal sexual traffic business establishment in order to prevent the spread of the illegal sexual traffic business establishment and to establish a sound sexual culture; (b) the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for 2 years on June 12, 2013 for the crime of violating the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) and repeated the instant crime during the suspension period; (c) on the other hand, the Defendant is led to the confession of the instant crime; (d) there was no record of criminal punishment for the same crime; (e) the number of the instant crimes committed, the period of crime, the size of gains acquired by the crime, and other various conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments, including the Defendant’s age, family environment, and the circumstances before and after the crime.