The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (ten months of imprisonment, two years of suspended sentence, two years of probation, two years of social service, 400 hours of imprisonment) is too unreasonable;

2. Although the defendant led to the confession and reflect of the crime of this case, the act of arranging sexual traffic does not have a significant social hazard, such as the commercialization of women's sex and undermining the sound sexual culture and good morals, and the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments is in need of a simple and strict punishment against the owner of the business who operates illegal sexual traffic establishments even in order to establish a sound sexual culture, and the defendant is equipped with the entertainment facilities by leasing a telecom with a public notice box located in the Young-si, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, the defendant was equipped with several sexual traffic businesses by employing various sex trafficking women and soliciting customers through the site of arranging sexual traffic, etc., and the crime of this case has already been punished for the same kind of crime. In particular, the defendant continued to engage in the business of arranging sexual traffic at the same place without being able to take full account of the circumstances that the defendant acquired through the crime of this case and the crime of this case, the period of the crime of this case and the age of the defendant's profits before and after the crime of this case, and other unfair sexual circumstances revealed.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.