All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment of a fine of three million won is too heavy or is unreasonable.

2. On the other hand, the act of arranging sexual traffic does not have a significant social hazard, such as putting women into commercialization and impairing the sound sexual culture and good morals, and it is disadvantageous to the business owner who operates illegal sexual traffic businesses in order to prevent the spread of the illegal sexual traffic businesses, and to establish a sound sexual culture, taking full account of the following: (a) the Defendant’s age, family environment, and circumstances before and after the crime, etc., and other various sentencing conditions that are shown in the records and arguments, the punishment imposed by the court below is adequate, too heavy or less, in light of the following: (b) the sexual traffic business owner who operates illegal sexual traffic business establishments; and (c) the punishment imposed by the court below is necessary for the establishment of a sound sexual culture.

3. If so, the defendant and the prosecutor's appeal against the judgment of the court below are without merit. Thus, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.