The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (one year of imprisonment and a fine of 10,000,000 won, two years of suspended execution, confiscation and additional collection) is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendant confessions and reflects the instant crime, the fact that there is no criminal records of the same kind, etc. However, the act of arranging sexual traffic does not have a significant social hazard, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, and thus preventing the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments, and establishing a sound sexual culture, the act of arranging sexual traffic is in need of a simple and severe punishment as to the owner of the business who operates illegal sexual traffic establishments, without a short period of the crime, and there is a little amount of proceeds from the crime, and other various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments, such as the Defendant's age and happiness environment, the method of the crime, and the circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the sentence against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.