Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of six months.

except that from the date of this judgment.

Criminal facts

Defendants are not narcotics handlers.

1. Defendant A

A. On October 2015, the Defendant, along with E, passed the water deposited in the bio-water disease and inhaled the smoke, as soon as possible, at the mutual influent influent in the fluorial dong, Ansan-si, a member of Ansan-si, a member of Ansan-si, with E, on the meblopic ambloper (hereinafter “copon”). The Defendant, along with E, took the meblopic ambloper’s ambloploplopl (hereinafter “coploplopl”) on the amblopter’s ambloploplopl.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspired with E to administer philophones.

B. On October 2015, the Defendant administered phiphonephones in collusion with E in collusion with the Defendant’s house F, 302, Ansan-si, Hasan-si, and the Defendant’s house, in the same manner as the entry in paragraph 1(a).

(c)

On November 17, 2015, the Defendant transferred KRW 500,000 from E to the national bank account in the name of the Defendant, put the non-opopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopopic into the white paper, concealed it in the mail of the building in the vicinity of the above Defendant’s home, and E provided information about the location of the opopopopopopicopopopicopopopopopic from E.

Accordingly, the defendant sold a philophone to E.

2. Joint crimes committed by the Defendants

A. On December 19, 2015, the Defendants, in collusion with G of Chinese nationality, administered phiphones in the same manner as described in paragraph 1(a).

B. On December 21, 2015, the Defendants, in collusion with the said G, administered phiphones in collusion with the said G in a Motour room located in H at the time of the Chungcheongbuk-si.

(c)

On December 22, 2015, the Defendants, in collusion with the above G, administered phiphones in the same manner as described in paragraph 1(a).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocols and statements made by the prosecution concerning E concerning the interrogation of suspects;

1. Each protocol of seizure;

1. Application of each statute of appraisal;

1. The Defendants of the pertinent legal provisions and the choice of punishment on criminal facts: Article 60 of the Narcotics Control Act.