1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. The following facts may be admitted, either as a matter of dispute between the parties or as a whole, by taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings as set out in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 5, and evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including paper numbers):

The Defendant medical corporation E (hereinafter “Defendant Foundation”) is a legal entity that operates G Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) in Mayang-si, Mayang-si, Mayang-si, and the Defendant D is the psychosissis and doctor of the Defendant Hospital, and the Plaintiff A was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital from June 20, 2013 to July 1, 2013, and was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital and was treated with psychotropic medicine from Defendant D. The Plaintiff’s spouse and the Plaintiff C are the Plaintiff’s children.

B. On June 20, 2013, Plaintiff A filed a complaint with Defendant Hospital on the grounds of the senscence of both the right side and the hand, and Defendant D, who was designated as the doctor in charge of Plaintiff A, diagnosed Plaintiff A’s name of illness with cerebral cerebrs and high blood pressure on the same day through brain MRI and MRA examination, etc., and then, Plaintiff A hospitalized Plaintiff A to Defendant Hospital and performed preserved treatment, such as blood exclusive surgery.

C. On June 28, 2013, Plaintiff A complained of two copies to Defendant D on June 28, 2013, and the nurse of the Defendant Hospital was in charge of the Jindo (hereinafter “the instant injection”). At around 14:00 on the same day, the nurse of the Defendant Hospital was in charge of the Jindo (hereinafter “the instant injection”).

Plaintiff

A was discharged from the Defendant Hospital on July 1, 2013, as the brain symptoms were improved.

E. After that, on July 15, 2013, Plaintiff A complained of a pain on the left-hand side of the instant injection at the Defendant hospital, and again returned to the Defendant hospital, following the Defendant D’s instruction that the Plaintiff was given additional medical treatment from the static surgery, but the X-ray inspection was conducted by the Defendant hospital’s doctor, but the Plaintiff returned to the Republic of Korea without any particular number of people.

F. However, on July 21, 2013, Plaintiff A suffered serious pains to the left-hand side of the bridge, and transferred it to the emergency room of the Defendant Hospital, and on the same day.