1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiffs ordering additional payment is revoked.

The defendant is the plaintiff.

Based on the facts, Plaintiff A is a person who was subject to the Defendant’s drilling and artificial disc driveing at the D Hospital located in the O (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) operated by the Defendant, and Plaintiff B is the wife of Plaintiff A.

Plaintiff

On August 10, 2012, the plaintiff A had been in the past history of A and the internal source of the defendant hospital in the E Hospital located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City P, and had been in the implementation of the spener lumbar Microsy (OLM) and continued to provide preserved treatment, such as physical therapy and necal blocking, at the above hospital and its neighboring area (local) hospital after the operation.

Plaintiff

A around April 2013, the Nursing Record Book (No. 1-7) of the Defendant Hospital at G Hospital was written only as Q Hospital. However, as seen thereafter, the Plaintiff appears to be the same hospital in light of the fact that the Plaintiff was within the Incheon Southern-gu R Hospital around December 2015, which was after the instant surgery, around December 2015.

It was recommended from the medical personnel that it would be better to implement the PEIF, as an operational treatment for the lusium lusium lusium lusium lady Flusium lady lusium lusium laf.

Plaintiff

A was transferred to the Defendant Hospital on April 30, 2013, and around May 2013, A was implemented in the Defendant Hospital, screen lamps(Scramer and electric wave, which reduces and mitigates pains by using the scramer and electric wave).

On July 5, 2013, Plaintiff A, including the implementation of the instant surgery, was hospitalized in Defendant Hospital by appealing for the termination of the lack Pain (LBP) and the termination of the bridge between the two parties.

The medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital conducted a pre-treatment test on both sides against the Plaintiff A on the date of hospitalization, and as a result, it was confirmed that the neutism of the 5th century was confirmed on both sides, and the neutism of the neutism.

(Bilteral L-S radicopy, place of temporary location, evolved L5 root in L5 xure) The Defendant, on July 6, 2013, after the extension of conical signboards with respect to the Plaintiff A under the overall anesthesia on July 6, 2013.