logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.09.23 2016고단890
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2016 High Order 890] The Defendant and D forged the resident registration certificate using other personal information of the person known to him through a shipbuilding unit, and then purchased cash services or goods and services with a credit card issued by the Defendant and D, and one person shall deliver forged resident registration certificates to the Defendant and D using his resident registration certificates received from the Defendant and D and other personal information, and the Defendant and D conspired to have 30% of the amount of cash services received, and 70% of T.

1. In accordance with the above public offering, the Defendant drafted a U resident registration certificate in the name of U using T on December 2014, 2014, excluding only pictures and the official seal of the Defendant’s resident registration certificate, using a special paper indicating personal information, such as U’s name, resident registration number, etc., on the remaining parts of the Defendant’s resident registration certificate.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with D and T, forged one copy of the resident registration certificate against U in the name of the head of the Busan Metropolitan City, which is a public document, for the purpose of uttering, and forged 11 copy of the total resident registration certificate, which is a public document, from October 1, 2014 to March 2015, as shown in attached Table 1.

2. In accordance with the foregoing public offering, the Defendant used a forged public document 29 times between October 2014 and March 2015, 2015, on the following grounds: (a) in order to receive a new credit card in the name of U as stated in paragraph 1, the Defendant: (b) presented a forged resident registration certificate to the employees of the card company that was aware of such forgery as if he/she were a document duly formed; and (c) exercised a forged public document 29 times during the period from Oct. 10, 2014 to Mar. 2015.

3. On December 12, 2014, the Defendant: (a) stated the “U” column in the “applicant” column using a package of a letter of confirmation of application and a letter of acceptance in the north-Gu, Mapo-gu, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Mapo-si, Ma

arrow