logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2013. 11. 28. 선고 2013두15569 판결
부과처분을 직권취소하여 소의 이익이 없어 부적법하므로 각하[각하]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2012Nu39799 (2013.03)

Title

Dismissal as it is improper to revoke a disposition of imposition ex officio as there is no interest in litigation.

Summary

Since it is recognized that the disposition of this case was revoked ex officio after filing an appeal, the lawsuit of this case is not extinguished and thus, it is illegal to have no interest in the lawsuit.

Related statutes

Article 26-2 of the National Tax Basic Act

Cases

2013du1569 Disposition of revocation of imposition of income tax, etc.

Plaintiff-Appellee

SAA

Defendant-Appellant

2.Dobong Head of the Chuncheon Tax Office;

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2012Nu39799 Decided July 3, 2013

Imposition of Judgment

November 28, 2013

Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The part against the Defendants in the judgment of the first instance shall be revoked, and this part of the lawsuit shall be dismissed.

The defendants shall bear the total costs of the lawsuit as to the dismissed part of the lawsuit.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

When an administrative disposition is revoked, such disposition shall lose its validity and no longer exists, and a revocation lawsuit against a non-existent administrative disposition is unlawful as there is no benefit of lawsuit (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2012Du18202, Dec. 13, 2012).

According to the records, the Defendants were aware of the fact that the court of first instance revoked ex officio the disposition of imposition as to the part against the Defendants in the judgment of the court of first instance, in accordance with the purport of the judgment of the court of first instance and the judgment of the court of first instance, which was after the filing of the instant appeal. Therefore, regarding the revoked part in the lawsuit of this case, it is deemed that the claim for revocation of a disposition without its validity has already been extinguished, and thus, it was unlawful.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below shall be reversed, and since it is sufficient for the Supreme Court to directly judge this part, the judgment of the court of first instance corresponding thereto shall be revoked, and this part of the lawsuit shall be dismissed. The total cost of the lawsuit as to the dismissed part of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Defendants. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent

arrow