logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015. 10. 30. 선고 2014구단55703 판결
양도소득세 부과처분을 처분청이 직권취소하여 소 이익이 없음을 이유로 각하[각하]
Title

Rejection of disposition of capital gains tax on the ground that there is no interest in lawsuit by ex officio cancellation.

Summary

Rejection of disposition of capital gains tax on the ground that there is no interest in lawsuit by ex officio cancellation.

Cases

2014Gudan5703 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff

○ ○

Defendant

○ Head of tax office

Conclusion of Pleadings

October 21, 2015

Imposition of Judgment

October 30, 2015

Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the defendant

Cheong-gu Office

The Defendant’s disposition of imposition of KRW 00,000,000 on March 2, 2012 against the Plaintiff was revoked.

Reasons

If an administrative disposition is revoked, such disposition shall become null and void due to the revocation, and any longer exist;

not, and a revocation suit against a non-existent administrative disposition has no interest in the lawsuit.

Illegal (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2004Du5317, Sept. 28, 2006).

However, according to the records, the defendant's lawsuit is pending on July 17, 2015, and the defendant's lawsuit is pending.

Inasmuch as the revocation of the disposition imposing the acquisition tax ex officio is recognized, the action in this case does not exist.

The claim for cancellation of the share was made illegal because there was no interest in the lawsuit.

Therefore, the suit of this case is dismissed, and the litigation cost is borne by the defendant pursuant to Article 32 of the Administrative Litigation Act.

subsection (b) of this section.

arrow