logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 03. 30. 선고 2016두62306 판결
(각하) 소의 이익이 없어 부적법함[각하]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Busan High Court-2016-Nu22346 ( November 11, 2016)

Title

(Dismissal) is illegal as there is no interest in the lawsuit.

Summary

(C) The court below's decision against the defendant is unlawful as there is no interest in the lawsuit of this case, since the court below's decision against the defendant was revoked ex officio

Related statutes

Article 52 Special Deduction of Income Tax Act

Cases

Supreme Court Decision 2016Du62306 Decided global income and revocation of disposition

Plaintiff-Appellee

Kim 00

Defendant-Appellant

000 director of the tax office

Judgment of the lower court

Busan High Court Decision 2016Nu22346 Decided November 11, 2016

Imposition of Judgment

March 30, 2017

Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked, and this part of the lawsuit shall be dismissed.

All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by each party.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

If an administrative disposition is revoked, such disposition shall lose its effect and shall no longer exist, and shall exist

A lawsuit seeking revocation against an administrative disposition is unlawful as there is no benefit of lawsuit (Supreme Court).

See Supreme Court Decision 2012Du18202 Decided December 13, 2012

According to the records, the defendant filed the appeal of this case and then rendered the first instance judgment in accordance with the purport of the judgment below.

Since it can be known that the part against the defendant in the judgment was revoked ex officio, the above part of the lawsuit in this case concerning the cancellation is already extinguished, and thus, it became inappropriate as there was no benefit of lawsuit without any benefit of lawsuit.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below is reversed, and this case is sufficient for the court to directly judge.

The part against the defendant among the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked, and this part of the lawsuit is dismissed, and the total cost of the lawsuit is borne by each party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

arrow