A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

1. C-related

A. On June 10, 2009, the Defendant: (a) stated that “On-site: F 130,00, G 130,000, G 130,000, A 130,000, H 130,000, I 130,000, and J 130,000, 130,000,000, and 10,000,000, and 100,000,000,000, in the nearby E’s residence located in Asan City D; and (b) written signature as if the signature of C employee was signed.

The Defendant, for the purpose of uttering, specified the nominal owner of the written indictment in which the name of the person who is a private document concerning the certification of facts is infinite, as “C”. However, according to the written indictment in which the Defendant is infinite, the nominal owner of the written written written written written written written indictment for interrogation of suspects and written written written written written written written indictment for the Defendant of the prosecutor’s office, as the nominal owner of the written written written written written written written written confirmation for the above work is the signatory of the written written written written written written written confirmation for the above work, and the signatory is not working in C, so it is reasonable to deem the nominal owner of the written written written written confirmation for the work as “personally undisfinite person.” Since the nominal owner of the written written written written written

From that time to October 31, 2009, 90 copies of the work certificate in the name of the person without a personal document related to the verification of facts were forged by the following methods: (a) from that time, 1 copy of the work certificate in the name was forged, 90 copies of the work certificate in the name of the person without a personal document related to the verification of facts were forged.

B. On June 10, 2009, the Defendant issued 90 copies of a forged work certificate to K, from the time on October 31, 2009, by the following method: (a) on June 10, 2009, the Defendant, who was aware of the forgery in the above E, issued a forged work certificate to K, and subsequently exercised 90 copies of a forged work certificate, as shown in attached Table 1.

(c)

On June 10, 2009, the criminal defendant submitted a forged work certificate to the victim K on June 10, 2009.