logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.01.18 2016고단3113
사기등
Text

1. The punishment against Defendants A and B shall be ten months, and the punishment against Defendants B shall be one year and four months, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On July 12, 2012, Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the Busan District Court’s Branch Branch on July 12, 2012, and the execution of the sentence was terminated at the Ansan Prison on October 14, 2013. On January 5, 2016, Defendant A was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with labor for fraud in the Busan District Court’s Dong Branch Branch on January 12, 2017.

Defendant

B On February 15, 2016, the judgment was finalized on July 21, 2016 after being sentenced to two years of imprisonment by the Gwangju District Court for the crime of forging private documents.

[2016 High Order 3113, Defendant A, B] Defendant A, and F did not appear on the trial date, and were separated from the above Defendants.

In collusion with his or her nameless assistant members, he or she would make a so-called "work loan" available to those who have difficulty in receiving a loan by forging a written confirmation of acquisition and loss of health insurance qualifications and then receive and divide the fee from the person who requested the loan.

Accordingly, Defendant A and F colored the person who requested the loan, Defendant B received data from the person who requested the loan and delivered the data to the person who is not in charge of the name, and Defendant B shared the role of forging documents, etc. necessary for the loan.

1. On June 3, 2014, the Defendants: (a) informed the Defendant of the forgery of private documents and the use of the said investigation documents of G’s personal information, etc. from the mutual infinite tele-dong, Changwon-si, Changwon-si; and (b) informed the Defendant of the personal information of G infinite for the purpose of submitting it to the lending company.

Accordingly, a person who confirmed the acquisition and loss of health insurance qualification under the name of the president of the National Health Insurance Corporation at the same place on the same day and entered in the applicant column as “G” and “MM C” in the workplace subscription column, and forged a letter of confirmation of the health insurance qualification certificate, which is a private document on the fact-finding, and submitted as if he knew of the fact to the person in charge of the food savings bank loan.

In this respect.

arrow