Defendant

A A The fines of KRW 5 million, the fines of KRW 7 million for each of the defendant B and C, and the defendant D shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1 million.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is the representative of the G Trade Union H branch (hereinafter referred to as the “H branch”). Defendant C is the representative of the said I Business Sub-Committee, Defendant A is the representative of the said I Business Sub-Committee, Defendant A is the representative of the said I Business Sub-Committee, and Defendant D is the subsidiary of the said I Business Sub-Committee.

[2013 Highest 3101] On March 20, 2013, around 20:03, at the victim HH Co., Ltd., the J, a fire occurred in the cover of the loading box due to the heat of the exhauster of the supplied vehicle. As a result, the postponement, etc. flows into the I window, some workers show the old soil increase, and the representative of the I Labor Safety Department, K, who is the head of the I Labor Safety Department, suspended production.

After that, Defendant A discussed five representatives, including K, and decided to operate a horse from 21:30 to 21.

However, since L of the first division L of the chairperson had an internal ventilation to K in the factory, it was proposed that K had a defect in the authorized operation, and K has consented, and from 21:25 on the same day, K operated the production theater.

However, Defendant A violated the contents of consultation among the representatives who decided to operate a producer from around 21:30 on the same day, and thereby interfered with the victim’s automobile manufacturing business by force by dividing the location of an OK2-10 process, the chairperson from around 21:31 to 22:31 on the same day, and the F2-11 process emergency stop location, which is 11Ra, from the same day.

[2013 Highest 3343] From May 2012, the G Workers’ Union H non-regular branch (hereinafter “non-regular branch”) demanded H Co., Ltd. to convert the “all workers in the internal House” to regular workers in cooperation with the said H branch, and the special consultation was conducted, but there was a difference between the labor and management, which did not reach the labor-management agreement.

On August 16, 2012, H Co., Ltd. presented a letter of intent to employ 3,00 workers of the intra-company subcontractor by not later than 2016 in the course of wage negotiations with the above H branch, and later, it is suggested that 3,500 new employees will be employed until the first half of 2016 in the course of special consultation on December 13, 2012.