Defendants shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fines, only 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a representative of the book-keeping of the Committee for the E Committee of the C Association Sub-Chapter D, and Defendant B is the chairman of the same committee, G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “victim”) E in the Asan City F.

Around January 9, 2020, the injured company requested the E Committee to hold consultations to change the production rate of H and I per hour from 1:1 to 2:1. However, when the E Committee requested a rapid acceleration of production rate on the ground that the increase of the H production rate would result in labor intensity, the injured company decided that H's increase in production period could no longer be delayed, and that H's increase in production period could no longer be delayed on January 31, 2020, for the verification of increase in the labor intensity claimed by the E Committee.

1. At around 09:29 on January 31, 2020, Defendant A, at the J located in the above G Company E, he unilaterally opened a production pressing on the grounds that the victimized company determined as above and continued to put H in the production consumers. Defendant A’s management employees belonging to the victimized company were to stop the above production subcontractor from around 81 minutes until around 11:30 of the same day, including the 30 workers belonging to the E Committee, and the 81 minutes of the above E Committee’s employees were to stop to stop it.

As such, the Defendant suspended the production of a motor vehicle and prevented the damaged company from manufacturing a motor vehicle, thereby causing a loss equivalent to KRW 84,264,138, etc., thereby obstructing the manufacturing of the motor vehicle by force.

2. Defendant B, at around 10:01 on February 3, 202, at the place indicated in paragraph (1), the Defendant unilaterally suspended the production phone from around 82 minutes until around 12:02 on the same day by means of unilaterally pressing the production phone for the foregoing reasons.

Accordingly, the defendant suspended the production of a car and caused the damaged company to suffer a loss equivalent to KRW 85,304,436.