Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

Defendant

B The above fine shall not be paid.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who is working as the president of G children's house in the Namyang-si, takes charge of child care centers, supervises other employees, supervises infants, and care for infants in the same area. B is a person who has worked as the head of the Do and the child care center overall while working as the head of the Do.

If a nursery teacher working for a childcare center has worked for at least 15 days a month (at least 30 hours a week) among infant care teachers working for the childcare center, he/she may be paid subsidies pursuant to the Acts and subordinate statutes after being registered in the Integrated Information System for Infant Care (C. I.S).

On the other hand, from January 2013, Defendant B only worked as a member of a child care center from around 2013, and there was no fact that Defendant B had been employed as a member of the 3rd class of 15th class per month.

Nevertheless, on January 25, 2013, the Defendants conspired to connect Defendant B to the Integrated Information System for Infant Care at the Child Care Center’s office site and falsely registered that Defendant B had served as a 3-dominant teacher. On January 25, 2013, the Defendants received subsidies of KRW 250,000, including KRW 150,000 for improving the treatment of teachers around January 25, 2013, for improving the environment of teachers’ work, KRW 50,000 for teachers’ work environment, and KRW 50,000 for infants’ special work allowances, as well as KRW 50,00 in the name of Defendant B.

The Defendants, including that, from January 2013 to May 2017, 2014, filed a false claim for subsidies of KRW 5,450,00,00 in total, including KRW 2,550,00,00 for the improvement of the environment of teachers’ work, KRW 2,050,00 for the improvement of the environment of teachers’ work, and KRW 850,000 for the special work allowances for infants, and received such subsidies.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to receive subsidies by fraud or other improper means.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect by some prosecutors against the Defendants

1. Part concerning the statement of the H in the police interrogation protocol (two times) against the defendant A;

1. Each police statement made with respect to H, I, J, K, and L;

1. Copy of the police statement made to H;

1. Each statement of M, N,O, P, Q, R, S, and T;

1. U certification;