logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2018.04.26 2018고단147
영유아보육법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the president of the “D Child Care Center” located in Ansan-gu Mayang-si C.

No person who intends to establish and operate a child-care center shall obtain a subsidy or divert a subsidy by fraud or other improper means.

1. E, a teacher E-related child-care center teacher, shall work for the above child-care center from January 2015 to June 2017 as a strike from 9:0 a.m. to 3 p.m. in the above child-care center, and, in principle, only when he/she works for 8 hours a.m. on a daily basis at least 15 days a.m., he/she shall not be paid expenses for improving the working environment

Nevertheless, the Defendant reported the appointment and dismissal as if he worked as a teacher for at least eight hours in the day, and registered the contents thereof in the childcare and integration system, and received KRW 170,000 from around January 2015 to E’s bank account for the improvement of school work environment, and KRW 230,000 from around January 2015 to June 2017, and received KRW 12,440,000 in total from around 30 times as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table.

2. On January 2017, the Defendant with respect to teachers F was unable to receive more infants than infants due to the lack of teachers to work against the infants in the above D Child Care Center, and the Defendant was willing to falsely register the teacher F who does not work as a teacher of the infant care center as if he were a teacher of the infant care center.

On January 2017, the Defendant: (a) registered F as if he was working as a field teacher in infant care; (b) paid KRW 220,000,000 to F bank account in the name of F; and (c) paid the amount equivalent to the same amount under the same name as on February 2017, by allowing F to be paid to F to the said account under the same name as on January 2, 2017.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Investigation reports (informating of infant care services);

arrow