logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.05.25 2018고정618
영유아보육법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the representative of the “E” childcare center located in Namdong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City D.

No head of any nursery facility or infant care teacher shall receive any subsidy or use any subsidy by fraud or other improper means.

From July 3, 2015 to February 29, 2016, the Defendant served as an assistant teacher of the above child-care center at the above child-care center.

F by falsely reporting the F as a teacher for childcare, in order to deny the supply of basic childcare fees and treatment improvement expenses for the teacher for childcare, and the above F was unjustly granted KRW 6,048,580, and subsidies for treatment, KRW 3,410,000, which were based on childcare integration system from July 2015 to February 2016, by ordering G to register the F as a teacher for childcare, even though it did not actually have taken care of infants, and was in charge of events of childcare centers, photographs, computer and equipment repair, etc., but was directed by G.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Some statements made to F or G concerning the suspect examination protocol of each police officer;

1. A person who files an accusation, a copy of the observation records, a copy of the resignation, or a copy of the resignation, of the accusation records, evidentiary materials, or new growing baby;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the certified infant care teacher;

1. Relevant Article 54 of the Infant Care Act and Article 54 (2) 1 of the Infant Care Act and selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not good for the crime of this case, and the amount of the subsidies that the defendant unlawfully received is reasonable, but all the subsidies that the defendant unlawfully received were returned. The defendant did not have any record of punishment for the same kind of crime, and other conditions of sentencing indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, occupation, sex, family relationship, living environment, circumstances leading to the crime, etc., shall be determined as ordered by taking into account the following factors:

arrow