logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2018.06.21 2018고정12
영유아보육법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Status and in charge of the defendant’s duties】 The defendant’s primary office is the reduction of the national or public childcare center “C” in Chuncheon City B, and was in charge of administrative affairs, etc. of the above childcare center.

【State, etc. grants subsidies for expenses incurred in improving the working environment of full-time infant care teachers, etc. and special allowances (Do expenses), the State or local governments may fully or partially subsidize expenses incurred in infant care services, such as personnel expenses for infant care teachers, expenses incurred in excessive infant care, expenses incurred in operating infant care, promotion of the welfare of infant care teachers and staff, and provision of vulnerable infant care.

On the other hand, the Minister of Health and Welfare set the "Act on the Improvement of the Working Conditions for Former Infant Care Teachers" in accordance with the guidelines of "Guidance for Infant Care Services" in 2016 and 2017, and pays 20,000 won per month for the year 2016 and 220,000 won per month for the year 200,000 won for the year 2017, and the Gangwon-do shall set the "Special Allowances for Infant Care Services" in accordance with the guidelines of "Guidance for Infant Care Services" in 2016 and 2017, and pays 30,000 won per month for each infant infant care teacher.

【A person who commits a crime” shall not receive subsidies from the State, metropolitan organizations or local governments or appropriate subsidies by fraud or other improper means.

Nevertheless, on March 1, 2016, the Defendant sent a document stating "the report on the appointment and dismissal of persons working for childcare facilities" to the head of Chuncheon City Mayor, which was appointed as an infant care teacher in exclusive charge of the above child care center under the name of "C", based on the above report, on March 21, 2016, the Defendant applied for the special teacher's allowance to the Defendant on March 2016, and on March 28, 2016, filed an application for the Defendant for the improvement of the working environment for the infant care teacher on March 28, 2016.

However, in fact, the Defendant was not the “full-time childcare teacher” of the above infant care center, but the head of the office in charge of administrative affairs for the above child care center.

arrow