logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.06.01 2018고단245
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From August 29, 2017 to October 20, 2017, the Defendant: (a) leased Ctel 1135 from around August 29, 2017 to around October 20, 2017; (b) agreed to receive KRW 180,00 from many unspecified male customers, such as D, who reported and contacted advertisement of commercial sex acts; and (c) notified the said officetel to receive 180,000 won as the price for commercial sex acts; and (d) ordered the female sex trafficking E employed by the Defendant to have sexual intercourse once for 60 minutes with the male customers.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging sexual traffic.

"2018 Highest 356"

1. On August 17, 2017, around 20:15, the Defendant advertised Ctel 1148 in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and on the advertising site of a sexual traffic business establishment, the Defendant advertised “F” in the trade name. A sexual traffic women G employed by the Defendant reported the above advertisement and received 2.80,000 won from H having found the sex purchase.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging sexual traffic.

2. The Defendant, from November 25, 2017 to November 16:00, 2017, advertised the Gangnam-gu Seoul Officetel 528 and the advertising site of a sexual traffic business establishment with the trade name “I”. The Defendant, who had employed by the Defendant, received 170,000 won from the non-specific males who reported the above advertising, and had sexual intercourse.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

[2018 Highest 245]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each protocol of suspect examination of the police in relation to E or D (2018 high rank 356);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer in relation to G, H and J;

1. Application of investigation reports (on-site control photographs and Internet advertisement photographs of business places), investigation reports (the application of statutes to regulate and confirm three-time sexual traffic business of suspect Aytels);

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of Sexual Traffic, concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 19 (2) 1 of the same Act and selection of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code of Aggravation of Concurrent Crimes;

arrow