logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.28 2017고단2292
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and a fine of five million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. is a person who operates a commercial sex acts establishment under the trade name of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Officetel 1013 and 1214.

From early October 2016 to December 14, 2016, the Defendant employed “E”, etc. working for female employees of sexual traffic business establishments, and advertised sexual traffic business establishments through “F, etc.,” etc., through the Internet site of the advertisement site of the said business establishments. The Defendant arranged sexual traffic by allowing female employees of sexual traffic to receive sexual traffic payment from males who reported and contacted the said advertisement, and to have sexual intercourse with the male sexual organ, and by allowing them to have sexual intercourse with the male sexual organ under the above several times.

2. No person who violates the Health Act in a school shall conduct any business of providing services that are likely to conduct a sexual act or any similar act in a school environment sanitation and cleanup zone and facilities;

Nevertheless, from October 2, 2016 to November 3, 2016, the Defendant, from H elementary schools located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, 20 meters from J middle schools located in Seocho-gu Seoul, and around 98 meters from J middle schools located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I, operated the business of having sexual intercourse between the female employees of sexual traffic and the male purchasing, equipped with beds in each officetel, as described in paragraph 1, in the above Ctel, which is a school environment sanitation cleanup zone.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of a suspect of the police against K or L;

1. Statement made by the police against M;

1. Protocols of police seizure and list of seizure;

1. On-site and mobile phone conversations, on-site photographs, and copies of lease agreements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (verification of school environment sanitation and cleanup zone);

1. Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging and Arranging Sexual Traffic [Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic] and Article 19(2)1 of the same Act concerning criminal facts.

arrow