logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2013.09.24 2013고단998
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of two years and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of a maximum term of ten months and a short term of six months.

However, the defendant A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2013Kadan998] Defendant B is a person who is currently under probation, for whom the judgment on October 7, 2011 became final and conclusive and conclusive on September 7, 201, after having been sentenced to three years of probation and fine of 300,000 won in one year and two months of imprisonment for robbery, injury by robbery, etc. at the Daejeon High Court Cheongju District Court on September 29, 201.

1. The Defendants’ co-principal

A. On June 11, 2013, Defendant A’s unlawful uttering of official documents, fabrication of private documents, and uttering of private documents are as follows, around June 11, 2013:

As described in Paragraph B, the Defendants intended to borrow a vehicle from the siren company using the driver's license of the E obtained from the kind of friendly job D, but thought that there is a concern for the difference between the photograph on the driver's license and its external appearance to be seen as the body, and upon Defendant B’s consent, conspired to borrow the vehicle in the name of E using the driver's license of the E.

Defendant

A around June 11, 2013, at the back of G sales store G in Heung-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Cheongdong-gu, I would borrow a vehicle from Hrenk on the back side of the G sales store. Defendant B, who was requested by the Hrenk Staff J to present a driver’s license from Defendant A to deliver IYFsa car, presented that the driver’s license was completed for E, a public document issued by the Commissioner General of the Chungcheong Police Agency, and exercised the driver’s license unlawfully.

Defendant B, without authority, continued to exercise the right, stated “E” in the name column of the site for the car rental contract prepared by the J, an employee of the said Henecar, and signed by “E” next to that, forged a motor vehicle rental contract under the name of E, which is a private document concerning rights and obligations, and, in other words, issued a forged motor vehicle rental contract to J as if it was a document duly formed.

(b) forgeing private documents on June 12, 2013;

arrow