logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.11.30 2016고단2551
도로교통법위반(무면허운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 20, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) and the Defendant driven C Poter cargo while under the influence of alcohol of 0.172%, without obtaining a driver’s license, from the direction of the sunlight village and the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the

2. On April 20, 2016, around 21:54, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) on the underground passage of the border that is on the city’s own border; (b) on the ground that it is difficult for the Defendant to receive a demand to present an identification card to verify his/her personal information from D, who is in charge of the control of drinking driving; and (c) on the other hand, he/she should be subject to aggravated punishment due to his/her personal history of driving without a license or driving alcohol; and (d) so, he/she notified the Defendant

Accordingly, the defendant used the E resident registration number unlawfully.

3. When the Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 2, was under influence by driving under paragraph 1, and drafted a report on the statement of the situation of the driver under influence by driving under paragraph 1, the Defendant voluntarily signed the report “E” in the driver’s name column of the report.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged E’s signature for the purpose of exercising the right.

4. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 2, exercised the fluoral statement report as if he were the duly signed signature, which was forged as stated in paragraph 3, to D, who was aware of the forgery.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. A report on investigation (the sequence 4, 8, 12 of the evidence list);

1. On-going reports on drivers, and on the results of the control of drinking driving;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Entry in the report on the status of the driver and the application of the existing Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 148-2 (2) 2 of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow