A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 16, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 5 million by the same court on July 19, 2012, from among the crimes of violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court and its branch court of the Daegu District Court and its branch court of the racing for the crimes of violation of the Road Traffic Act for 2 years of suspension of execution of 8 months of imprisonment for the crimes of violation of the Road Traffic Act, 5 million won of fine due to the crimes of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and 5 million of fine due to the same crimes.

On April 12, 2013, at around 01:05, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver's license, driven an F-crin automobile at approximately 1km section in front of E in south-gu D, on the road located in south-gu, at the port of port, where the blood alcohol concentration is 0.135%.

2. Forgery of private signature, and the use of a false investigation or signature;

A. At around 01:05 on April 12, 2013, the Defendant: (a) controlled a police officer during drunk driving, as in the preceding paragraph, on the road located in Nam-gu, Nam-gu; (b) entered the Defendant’s drinking driving control result using a portable steering device; and (c) drafted a report on the driver’s drinking operation; (d) attempted to use his/her pro-Japanese H’s resident registration number of his/her pro-Japanese memory who used his/her pro-Japanese’s personal information and notified his/her name and resident registration number to conduct the above H’s drinking; and (e) signed his/her signature as if he/she was the signature of H using a pen on the screen as a result of the control of the driver’s drinking operation of the above G’s portable stage; and (e) stated the name of H using the pen’s name in the driver’s confirmation column of the driver’s statement prepared by the said G.

In this way, the Defendant forged the above H’s signature twice for the purpose of exercising the right.

B. The Defendant is a genuine signature to police officers G, who knew of the fact at the place specified in the preceding paragraph, of the report on portable inquiry of drinking driving and on the statement of drinking drivers, including the signature of H as above, at the place specified in the preceding paragraph.