logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.07.03 2014고단864
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 24, 2007, the Defendant issued a summary order of a fine of two million won for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Southern District Court on the grounds of a violation of the Road Traffic Act. On July 26, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of five million won for the same crime at the Incheon District Court on the same day. On February 23, 2014, the Defendant once again drives a cti-type car in the direction of about 900 meters from the roads near the Integrated Station located in Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu, Mapo-gu, Seoul to the same 397-5, without obtaining a driver’s license.

2. On February 23, 2014, the Defendant’s unlawful uttering of official document: (a) around 01:00, while driving a marina car as described in paragraph (1) on the street in front of 397-5, Mapo-gu, Seoul, Mapo-gu, Seoul, it was controlled by drinking, and was demanded to submit a driver’s license from D who belongs to the traffic safety department of the Seoul Mapo-gu Police Station.

The defendant, who is a prior official document, exercised his official document by presenting the E's driver's license under the name of the defendant's friendly child, who is the head of the Seoul Local Police Agency.

3. When the Defendant, at the time and at the place specified in the above paragraph 2, was investigated by D from the police officers belonging to the above traffic safety field to be suspected of drunk driving, the Defendant was friendly E to avoid punishment. In order to avoid punishment, the Defendant stated “E” in the driver’s name column and “F” in the resident registration number column using a yellow pen on the report form on the state of the driver’s situation, and marked off the name of the above E.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising a certificate, the Defendant forged a copy of the report on the state-owned driver status statement in the name of E, which is a private document related to the certificate of fact.

4. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in the foregoing paragraph 2, shall complete the written report on the statement of his/her own will, as above, to the above D who is aware of the forgery.

arrow