The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) the Defendant: (b) discarded tobacco and waste in front of the restaurant entrance operated by the victim D; or (c) did not desire the customers who want to enter the said restaurant; and (d) even though H voluntarily damaged the said restaurant, the lower court convicted the Defendant of interference with duties and damage to property among the facts charged in the instant case; and (b) the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts.

2. The following circumstances, which are acknowledged by the lower court by comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined, i.e., the victim D consistently laid away waste such as cigarette butts in front of a restaurant in the investigative agency and the lower court court’s court, and the Defendant her desire to take a sound before the restaurant.

The statement, 2. The victim H consistently expressed the face of the defendant in the investigative agency and the court of original instance, and the court of original instance that the victim H has consistently been faceed with the face of the defendant, with the appearance of sacrh and

(3) In light of the fact that it is difficult for the victim H to find any reasonable ground to damage his own safety, etc., the Defendant’s statement, ③ it is possible to fully recognize the fact that the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business and damaged the victim H’s safety, as stated in the judgment of the court below, since the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.