The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant only has made a verbal dispute with the victim, and there is no fact that he/she has taken advantage of the victim.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit, as stated in the facts charged, that the Defendant committed an assault against the victim.

(1) The victim consistently stated in the investigative agency and the court below that “the Defendant was placed at one time on the left side of the Defendant’s eye and the bones of the luminous body with his own right drinking, and the inside glag was displayed on the floor and the inside glag was removed.”

② At the investigative agency and the court below’s court, witness D also stated that “the defendant was satisfed when the victim was placed on the part of the victim’s left face, and the satisfe of the victim.”

③ According to the photograph taken immediately after the occurrence of the instant case, the part of the victim’s safe ear is displayed, and on the day of the instant case, the victim was diagnosed and diagnosed by a hospital due to a gymnasium, an inner gymosis, and an inner sacrine

④ The Defendant stated in the investigative agency and the lower court that “I am off the victim’s blag, but the victim did not comply with the victim’s request, thereby having been in excess of the victim’s blag, and the Defendant’s grandchildren contacted the victim’s face.”

(See, see, e.g., the 16th, 12th, 17th, etc. of the record of the trial). 3. Conclusion of the defendant's appeal is groundless, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4)