beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2014 Highest 5412]
1. On September 1, 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (accidents, Violence, etc.) committed an act of assaulting a driver of a motor vehicle who was driven by the victim to move in a DNA taxi operated by the victim C before the Samsung Hospital located in the Eup/Myeon in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, and brought an desire to “Chewing impule” on the part of the Defendant at the seat of the Defendant, without any justifiable reason at any time around the passage of the Fnoosur in front of the Fnoosur in Daegu-gu E, Daegu-gu, and used the victim’s back water on one occasion with the back water of the victim.
2. On September 1, 2014, Defendant 04:35, who interfered with the business, entered the “I restaurant” operated by the victim H in Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu Northern-gu, and expressed customers with other tables with the desire to read “Ising Chewing”, and let them walk the test fee. Accordingly, even though the JJ of the said Ising Employees did not called “Ising Chewing,” he did not go to several times, but did not go to approximately one hour and thirty minutes, and did not go to the rest of the disturbance, thereby obstructing the victim’s restaurant business by force.
[2014 Highest 5447]
1. On September 7, 2014, from around 09:17 to 09:25, the Defendant found her husband working for the said mix in the mcafeteria operated by the victim of the Lane located in Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu-gu, which interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force by avoiding disturbance, such as “nicker has a large sound that “Isn't have her father and her mother or her mother, seated, seated, she has to do so, she has to do so, she has to do so, to the floor, and to have she talked on the floor of the mar.”
2. From 14:00 to 14:05 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force by means of force, such as taking a large voice as set forth in paragraph (1), at the Mcafeteria operated by the victim.
3. From 18:00 to 18:10 on the same day, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force by means of force, such as taking a large voice as set forth in paragraph (1), at the Mcafeteria operated by the victim.
4. The Defendant from 18:40 on the same day to 18.