logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.04.17 2014고단262
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 On March 17, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 2.5 million for obstruction of business, due to obstruction of business, etc. at the Seoul Eastern District Court on March 17, 2009; on October 16, 2009, to a fine of KRW 7 million for obstruction of business, etc. at the Suwon District Court Branch on May 25, 2010; on April 24, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of KRW 6 months for obstruction of business at the Suwon District Court’s Sungnam Branch Branch Branch for obstruction of business; on September 28, 2012, the sentence of the suspended sentence became final and conclusive on November 26, 2012; and on June 4, 2013, the execution of each of the said sentence was terminated.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Interference with business;

A. On January 16, 2014, at around 14:14, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force by avoiding disturbance for about 30 minutes, i.e., the victim’s restaurant in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, referring to the large sound, “I have been drinking at her own. I have been drinking. I have been drinking at her drinking. I have to do anything. I have to live there.).”

B. On January 16, 2014, the Defendant 16:20, around 16:20, obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by forcibly avoiding disturbance for about 1 hour and 30 minutes, and thereby obstructing the victim’s restaurant business by putting the victim’s disturbance on a large sound to the customers who were eating at the “H restaurant in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F.”

2. The Defendant of obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) around 17:52 on January 16, 2014.

A request was received from the JJ for the reason that it was a police official belonging to the Song District Police Agency, who was dispatched after receiving a report on the facts constituting the crime stated in the paragraph.

The Defendant is aware of the fact that the Defendant was aware of the glass of the patrol vehicle that he was on the J and recommended the Defendant to return home.

arrow