Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who runs for the 8 Dong representative candidates of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E apartment building No. 2, and the victim F is a representative of the above apartment building.

On February 12, 2015, at around 18:00 to 19:00, the Defendant: (a) in the foregoing apartment complex of 8 units; and (b) in fact, the Defendant did not have embezzled public funds, including apartment management expenses, while working as the representative chairperson, despite the fact that the victim was working as the representative chairperson; (c) in spite of the fact that two residents, including G, who are eight Dong residents, are heard, and the above residents should not have “on one occasion

One candidate is the same line with the current representative of the Dong, and as the same representative of the Dong representative of the Dong representative of the Dong representative of the Dong representative of the Dong, we are able to get out of the house.

The candidate is marked one more, and the candidate should not be marked.

No. 2 2.

No. 2. The phrase “.........”

On February 12, 2015, at around 18:00 to 20:00 the above apartment house, and at around 8:00 the fact that the victim was working as the representative of the Dong representative, and even though there was no fact that the victim embezzled public funds, including apartment management expenses, it is necessary to ensure that two residents, including H, who are eight Dong residents, have been heard.

No. 2 of the same representative A.

In this regard, one candidate is the same person as the president of the Dong representative.

Since the president of the Dong representative has been too much while the president of the Dong representative, us has drawn up.

The number of candidates, such as the president of the Dong-dong representative, will be big if they are the Dong representative.

“.........”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each statement of the witness G and H in the second public trial records;

1. Each police statement protocol with G and H (the defendant and his defense counsel asserted that there was no fact as described in the facts constituting a crime in the judgment, but G and H have consistently observed that the defendant had consistently made the same remarks as the facts constituting a crime from an investigative agency to this court.

statement is made.

The defense counsel is each of the above witnesses.