beta
Text
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the amount ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. From March 2014 to February 2015, the Plaintiff is a person who served as the 8 Dong representative and the chairman of the council of occupants’ representatives of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D apartment from March 2014, and the Defendant is a person who runs the 8 Dong representative candidate mark 2 of the 8 Dong representative election held around February 2015.
B. The defendant is as follows.
On June 14, 2016, a summary order of KRW 1.5 million was notified as to the facts constituting the crime as stated in the preceding paragraph and filed an application for formal trial, but the judgment was rendered on June 14, 2016 (Seoul Eastern District Court 2015DaMa1166), and the Defendant appealed, but the judgment of dismissal was rendered on February 9, 2017 (Seoul East East East East District Court 2014No864), and the Defendant appealed again, but the judgment was finalized on April 3, 2017 (Supreme Court 2017Do3342), and the above judgment became final and conclusive as it is.
C. The defendant did not have embezzled public funds, including apartment management expenses, while the plaintiff worked as the representative of the apartment group. However, the defendant, at around 18:00 to 19:00 on February 12, 2015, the above apartment house 8 units of apartment units of the above apartment units of the above apartment units of the above apartment units of the 89:0:00 to 00 on February 12, 2015, two residents including E who are eight dong residents of the above apartment units of the above apartment units of the same apartment unit of the same group of the 1st head of the Dong group of the Dong group of the same group of the candidates, and the 1st head of the Dong group of the 1st group of the 2nd group of the 1st group of the candidates and 2nd group of the 2nd group of the 2nd group of the 1st group of the candidates, 18:00 to 200, the 1st group of the above candidates and the 1st group of the representatives of the Dong group of the 1st group of the residents.
Accordingly, the defendant is openly false.