The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. On February 16, 2012, the Defendant, as a person residing in Ctatado, embezzled public funds in collaboration with the president of the Veterans Association on June 16, 201, by 1.5 billion won and traveling with 1.5 million won and the president of the Veterans Affairs Council and the president of the Veterans Affairs Council and providing the remainder money as money and valuables to the president of the Veterans Affairs Council for 7 days, 2000 won and 1.5 million won and 3. The Defendant, as a person residing in Ctatado, embezzled public funds in collaboration with the president of the Veterans Affairs Council, 7 dong and standing auditors and 7 dong and standing auditors. There are various circumstances and evidence.

‘The Korean Veterans Welfare and Health Corporation shall put false facts into a civil petition with the Veterans Welfare and Health Center, and make the same contents known to the residents of the Veterans Welfare and damage the honor of victims D, E, F, G, H, I, J, and K, who are the representatives and standing auditors by means referred to in the residents of the Veterans Welfare and Health Center.

2. Determination

A. The fact that the defendant filed a civil petition against the Korea Veterans Welfare and Healthcare Corporation is recognized by preparing a written statement stating the facts charged in the instant case and submitting it to the Korea Veterans Welfare and Healthcare Corporation.

However, the part that "the victim embezzleds public funds of the autonomous council" among the above written contents is rather than explicitly indicating the specific facts, but it points out the problem that the victims, who are the dong representatives of the Round, operate the autonomous council as the community system of the Dong representative, unlike as prescribed in the management and operation regulations of the Round, and if the above operation regulations of the autonomous council constitute a violation of the management and operation regulations, it should be deemed that the defendant's opinion that the representative uses the operating expenses of the autonomous council as the embezzlement.

In addition, "victims have made a trip using 1,500,000 won of operating expenses of the self-governing council by entrusting with the president of the veterans' office," or "victims are keeping operating expenses of the self-governing council."