All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. misunderstanding of facts and legal principles 1) Defendant C heard that W candidates, the other party, who were in the vicinity of AA Park for election campaign of the candidates for E, who were employed by the Defendant C, would slander E candidates at the front of the AA Park, and moved to and look at the place of the election campaign for W candidates.

Defendant C was in a friendly relationship with the former himself and the latter.

W candidate's election campaignmen listen to the speech that slanders E candidates to the election campaignmen, and W candidate's election campaignmen moved to the election campaign vehicle of W candidate, and therefore, W candidate's election campaignmen prevented Defendant C.

Since then, Defendant C reported X member (the Chairperson of the Docheon Management Committee for the W candidate) who had been able to support W at the time, and tried to request that W candidate be able to comply with W candidate's strategic success without any competition, but W candidate's election campaign team was tight or knife Defendant C, and became knife by preventing W candidate's election campaign workers from spreading or knife W candidate C.

2) Defendant A had been near the AA Park in order to hear the horses that the candidate side is in the direction of the AA Park and to conduct an election campaign, and attempted to request that the X members of the W candidate provide an explanation on the success of the W candidate's strategic strategy without good faith. However, Defendant A's election campaign team prevented Defendant A and caused the franchis by controlling the Defendant A.

3) Defendant B had no person to view it in the election office of the candidate E, and therefore, it was around AA Park. As seen earlier, Defendant B left the election office of the candidate to go to the female employees. As such, as seen earlier, Defendant B got to go to the election vehicle of the candidate W.

Accordingly, the election campaignmen of the W candidate prevented Defendant B from doing so, and Defendant B had a hard disc.