The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the person who works as a worker at the construction site at the construction site and who was a person of C who was the complainant.

1. The Defendant from around 02:30 on April 18, 2018

5. Between around 19.07:28, the complainant sent text messages, including “each misunderstanding misunderstanding d,” and “a person who finds it difficult to see that the complainant did not do so,” on the grounds that the complainant notified her objection at an insular place, thereby threatening the complainant.

2. The Defendant from around April 18, 2018

5. During the period of 31. Around the same day, "a person Chewingly" for the foregoing reasons at an inferable place; or

The author sent a voice message to the complainant, including “I need to observe the breath on this job,” “I have to talk with good faith,” and “I have to talk with good faith,” thereby threatening the complainant.

3. From May 19, 2018, the Defendant

5. Between around 20. Around 20.m., the complainant’s house in Busan Shipping Daegu DJE, which was the office of the complainant, threatened the complainant, by threatening the above complainant’s house fladsings and sound.

The Defendant, in the manner of paragraph 1. A total of nine times, 26 times in total, and 3 times in total, and 4 times in total, by the method of subsection 1.

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 283(3) and (1) of the Criminal Act;

B. Declaration of withdrawal of complaint: Submission of a statement of withdrawal of complaint to the effect that the victim will revoke the complaint to the defendant on November 6, 2018, which was after the prosecution of this case.

(c) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;