Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
Indictment
1. Around July 24, 2018, the Defendant sent C message stating that “A victim B (here 25 years of age) who was in a fluoral relationship at a Daegu or lower place (Tgu) was the Hague and was the victim, and “Afluorddd, DNA, fluor, without any end of the limit of shed, lost the USB, or acted,” “Afluor,” “Afluor,” “Afluor,” “Afluor,” “Afluor,” “Afluor,” “Afluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, and fluor, fluor, fluored, fluor,” and “Afluor, fluord, fluord, fluord, fluord, fluor, fluor,” sent the victim’s sexual relation image.
2. Around August 8, 2018, the Defendant sent C message to the victim at a margu or smaller location, stating that “I have only come to know, live together, and have come to us, and have come to us.” The Defendant sent the victim the victim’s message “I have no choice but to go to us............”
Judgment
The facts charged in the instant case cannot be prosecuted against the clearly expressed will of the victim under Article 283 (3) of the Criminal Act as a crime falling under Article 283 (1) of the same Act.
According to the records, on November 13, 2018, after the prosecution of this case was instituted, the defendant expressed his/her intent not to have the victim punished under the agreement with the victim. The prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.