The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant maintained a de facto marital relationship with the victim B (Woo, 21 years of age) from his/her oil around February 2014 to February 2018. On February 28, 2018, there was a new male-gu relationship with the victim, and the victim refused to meet with the Defendant, leading the victim to send intimidation to the victim.

Accordingly, on March 1, 2018, from around 08:00 to 16:05 on the same day, the Defendant sent the victim with a mobile phone from the Defendant’s dwelling in Seongbuk-gu Seoul and the third floor, “on the ground that the Defendant was inside the house of Korea, it would be going to the right to go to North Korea,” and “on the ground that the Defendant was unable to live in Korea at the time of elevation,” and “on the ground that the Defendant sent a Kakao Stockholm message to the Defendant, “on the house, it would be sent to the Defendant, at the same time, to the Defendant’s dwelling in Seongbuk-gu Seoul and the third floor,” and “on the ground that the Defendant sent one to the Defendant, at the same time, the victim threatened the victim by transmitting seven copies of the photos, such as the sex video and the victim’s sound, the chest, etc.

2. This part of the facts charged is an offense falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act.

Accordingly, according to the written withdrawal of complaint submitted to this court on April 13, 2018, it is apparent that the victim expressed his/her wish not to punish the defendant. Thus, the indictment of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.