A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 11, 2012, at around 01:41:29, the Defendant reported that two police officers, such as the Jeonnam-gu Police Station E-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Police Station, sent a phone call to the 112 reporting center in their own house without having his or her or her or her or her or her or her or her or she had his or her or her or her or her or her or her or her or she had his or her or her or her or her father take care of the Defendant’s dwelling, thereby obstructing the police officers from performing their legitimate duties relating to public safety and maintenance of order of the police officers by deceptive means, and from that time to May 17, 2013, the Defendant filed a false report 112 times in total with the police officers on a total of 33 occasions from that time to May 17, 2013, thereby obstructing the police officers from performing their duties relating to public peace and order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. 112 Declarations, and 112 Declarations, respectively; and

1. Each investigation report (related to the number of cases in which 112 reports are received, related to the dispatch of 112 reports, and false reports);

1. The application of the Act and subordinate statutes of Part VII of a record recording recording recording, CD-recording, recording recording, and reporting of 13-Type A 15173, No. 15173;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crimes, and Article 137 of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act ( considered favorable circumstances among the reasons for sentencing following the suspended sentence);

1. The defendant for sentencing reasons under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc., who has repeatedly reported to police officers engaged in public security duties in several months, or expressed their desire or violence to prevent them from handling criminal reports of this case, in light of the background of the crime, frequency of the crime, method of the crime and period of the crime, etc., although the nature of the crime is not negligible, the defendant has the same criminal records.