A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On March 10, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Busan District Court on August 6, 2010 and completed the execution of the sentence in the Busan Correctional Institution.

On July 25, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Busan District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 26th of the same month, and on January 10, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Busan District Court, which became final and conclusive on January 18, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

On March 2013, the Defendant provided social welfare programs, such as the provision of raw materials, to basic recipients, the elderly living alone, etc., under the trade name of “D” in Busan-gun, Busan-gun.

1. Around March 2013, the Defendant forged a private document and the display of a falsified document made it possible for the Defendant to divide and keep copies of the written resident registration certificate to E (n, 91 years of age) who is the elderly living alone at the foregoing D office, and made it possible to keep the copies of the written resident registration certificate. On the other hand, the Defendant entered “E”, “F”, “F” in the resident registration number column, “E” in the subscriber column, and “E” in the subscriber column, and signed it next to the E’s name.

As a result, the Defendant forged one copy of a new service contract in the name of E, which is a private document on rights and obligations, for the purpose of uttering, and exercised it by delivering the forged new service contract to H agency employee who is unaware of the fact at H agency located in a place not exceeding Busan on March 2, 2013 as if it were genuine.

2. The Defendant, as described in paragraph 1, filed an application for multiple phone calls by forging and using a new service contract in the name of E.

However, the defendant did not intend to pay the installment or use fee of the mobile phone when opening the mobile phone.

The defendant deceivings a mobile phone agent, and is on the same day from the Victim SK Telecom Co., Ltd.