A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

[Criminal Power] On November 25, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud, etc. in the Youngcheon District Court’s Young-gu branch on November 22, 201, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 22, 2012.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Forgery of private documents;

A. On July 5, 2011, the Defendant: (a) indicated the name column E, in E, resident registration number column, F, and the applicant customer column E in its name on the paper of the new service contract of 64G located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu “D” mobile communications store; and (b) signed on the name side by using a black fence on the paper of the new service contract of 64G.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged a new service contract in the name of E, a private document on rights and obligations.

B. Around July 25, 201, the Defendant signed the loan interest rate of 22 days (30,000), 36.5% per month in the column of the loan interest rate of 36.5% per annum in the column of the loan interest rate of 22 days (30,000), the date of receipt on July 25, 201 in the form of the monetary loan loan contract (i.e., the date of the contract by using a folding pen on the paper of the money loan loan contract (i.e., the date of the contract) received by facsimile from (i.e., (ii) the Defendant from (ii) the Defendant’s private post office located in the private north-west of Gangwon-do, through facsimile from (iii) the date of receipt, and (ii) the Defendant’s name written E in the debtor column.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged a letter of monetary loan contract in the name of E, a private document on rights and obligations.

2. Uttering a falsified investigation document;

A. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1(a), exercised the forged new service contract as if it were duly formed with G, an employee who is aware of such forgery.

B. On July 25, 2011, the Defendant: (a) had an employee under the name of the Defendant, who was aware of the forgery at the Busan Yeung-dong 114-2 located in Gangseo-si, Gangwon-do; (b) exercised the forged monetary loan contract as if it was duly concluded.

3. Fraud;

A. The Defendant forged at the time and place specified in paragraph 1(a) as above.