Text
The sentence against the accused shall be determined by a fine of KRW 3,00,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On December 16, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment of one year and two months at the Gwangju District Court for fraud, etc. and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 28, 2013;
1. On February 20, 2012, at C mobile phone agencies located in B on February 18:0, 2012, indicated D’s name column of customer registration number No. 101, 504, and D’s name column of applicant customer registration number column in E and resident registration number column in the paper of the new contract for mobile phone services located in B at B on February 20, 2012, and forged one copy of D’s mobile phone service new contract in the name of private document concerning the rights and obligations for the purpose of signing and exercising the name column of applicant customer registration number;
2. At the date and time set forth in paragraph 1 above, by submitting to G the agent G a forged mobile phone service new contract as if the contract was duly completed at the same time and at the same time, and exercising this right;
3. The date, time, time, and place mentioned in the above paragraph (1) as mentioned above, by deceiving the victim G as if the person in question opens a mobile phone with the permission of D on the owner of the mobile phone, and then deceiving the victim G, which is equivalent to KRW 919,130 of the market price from the victim’s location, and acquired it by taking one cell phone (fl, SU540), and acquired property benefits equivalent to KRW 774,990 using the above mobile phone for about one month.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. The police statement concerning G;
1. A statement in a new service contract;
1. Each description of the investigation report (58,59 pages);
1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes in which investigation reports are entered;
1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;
(a) Article 231 of the Criminal Act;
(b) The occupation of holding a falsified survey document: Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act;
(c) The point of fraud in each judgment: Article 347 (1) of each Criminal Code (elective selection of fines);
1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;
1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code among concurrent crimes.