1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is as follows, except for the part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows, since the part of the judgment of the court of first instance as to this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (except for the part as to the confirmation of the right to claim payment of deposit money against the co-defendant B, C, D, E, Samsung Fire and Marine Insurance, Hyundai Marine Fire and Fire Insurance, Hyundai Marine Insurance Co., Ltd., Ltd., and the part concerning the right to claim

Defendant B’s “Defendant B” in the judgment of the first instance court is “Co-Defendant B”, “Defendant C” is “Co-Defendant C of the first instance trial”; “Defendant D” is “Co-Defendant D of the first instance trial”; “Defendant E” is “Co-Defendant E of the first instance trial co-Defendant; “Defendant Samsung Fire Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. of the first instance trial”; “Defendant Samsung Fire Co., Ltd. of the first instance trial”; “Defendant Hyundai Marine Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. of the first instance trial”; “Defendant Hyundai Marine Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. of the first instance trial Co-Defendant Hyundai Marine Fire Insurance Co., Ltd.” is “Defendant Hyundai Marine Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. of the first instance trial”; “Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co., Ltd.

The first instance court's 4 pages 2 and 6 shall read " December 16, 2014" respectively as " December 26, 2014."

The court of first instance calculated the amount of damages of the building of this case in the amount of KRW 325,54,801, following the procedure for evaluating the amount of damages under the part 6 of the court of first instance.

On May 17, 2015, "B" on May 27, 2015, 2015, of the 7th sentence of the first instance trial, is "A" on May 27, 2015. The part of the 7th sentence through 9th sentence of the first instance trial is "(based on recognition") without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 7, Gap evidence 8-1 and 2, Gap evidence 10, Eul evidence 1 and 9 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply). The part of the 8th sentence of the first instance trial is "as soon as possible."

Next, the Supreme Court Decision 2017Da218208 Decided August 18, 2017 cited by the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant”) differs from this case and the facts.