1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following reasons. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article

(A) In light of the allegations and evidence added in the trial, the fact-finding and judgment of the first instance court is not different. The Defendant Company is deemed to be a “stock company A”, the “Tgu Bank” to be the “Tgu Bank of Daegu”, the “Defendant B” to be the “B”, and the “Defendant C” to “C”, and the “Defendant D” to “D”.

Part 7 of the judgment of the first instance court, Part 18 and Part 6 of the judgment of the first instance are “Defendants” as “stock company A, C, B, and D”, and part 8 and 19 of the judgment of the court of first instance are “stock company A”.

On October 23, 2014, the first instance court’s decision No. 11 stated “No. 23, 2013” as “No. 23, 2014.”

No. 7 of the judgment of the first instance court, “the delivery date of the duplicate of the complaint of this case” is deemed to be “the delivery date of the duplicate of the complaint of this case.”

On the 9th judgment of the first instance court, the Defendant E is moving to Defendant E.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant E and Daegu Bank shall be dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.