1. The Plaintiff’s appeal against the Defendants and all appeals by Defendant G, H, and I are dismissed.

2. Between the Plaintiff and Defendant F.

1. The reasons for the court’s explanation concerning this case are as stated in the part against the Defendants in the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the dismissal of the judgment of the court of first instance as set forth below, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 402 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In the judgment of the first instance court, “Defendants” is “Defendants and Codefendant B, C, D, and E of the first instance trial, “Defendant B” is “Codefendant B of the first instance trial,” “Defendant C” is “Codefendant C of the first instance trial,” “Defendant D” is “Codefendant D of the first instance trial,” and “Defendant E” is “Codefendant E of the first instance trial.”

Part 5 of the judgment of the first instance court was agreed on the 20th "(hereinafter referred to as the "instant sales contract")".

Each "this Court" in the 6th, 17th, 7th, 16th, 9th, 3, 9, and 21th of the judgment of the court of the first instance shall be the Daejeon District Court.

"on the date of distribution on January 8, 2004" in Part 3 of Part 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be "on the date of distribution on January 8, 2014".

No. 20 of the first instance court's judgment No. 10 is the "Evidence No. 20 of the first instance court's judgment" with "Evidence No. 20 through 28 of the A, and Evidence No. 31 of the A.

Part 16 of the first instance court's decision "76,147,944 won" is 766,147,944 won in the second instance court's decision (the original is less than the original in the calculation process; hereinafter the same shall apply).

Part 5 of the judgment of the first instance court is "the date of the pronouncement of this judgment" in Part 18.

The evidence No. 21 of the first instance court's judgment No. 21 of the first instance court's 18 shall be "Evidence No. 21, 22, 29 through 31 of the A".

2. Accordingly, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant F is dismissed as it is without merit. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant G, etc. is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claim is dismissed as it is without merit. The part against the defendants in the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion. Thus, the plaintiff's appeal against the defendants and the appeal against the defendant G are dismissed as it is without merit.