1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant is modified as follows.

The defendant shall enter the attached Form from the plaintiff.

1. The defendant's grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the evidence submitted in the court of first instance is deemed to be sufficient to find facts in the court of first instance and determine even if the evidence additionally submitted in this court is presented.

Therefore, the court's explanation on this case is that the part of the claim against Co-Defendant C Co-Defendant C Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co-Defendant Co., Ltd. in the first instance court's decision excluding the part concerning the Co-Defendant Co

The following parts are dismissed, and the judgment of the court of first instance is added to the defendant's argument that the defendant is new in this court under Paragraph 2 below. Thus, this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary part] Each “Defendant B Co., Ltd.” in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance court is each “Defendant”; each “Defendant C Co., Ltd.” is each “Defendant Co., Ltd. of the first instance trial”; each “Defendant Co., Ltd. of the first instance trial” is each “Defendant and Co., Ltd. of the first instance trial”; and each “attached Form” is each “Defendant Co., Ltd. of the first instance trial.”

No. 1.B. of the judgment of the first instance.

1) Of paragraph (1) of the same Article, the second line “H” in the second line “H” is deemed to be “H”. Of the last line of the first instance judgment No. 41(b) of the first instance court’s judgment, the Plaintiff paid KRW 861,037,000 in total, and paid KRW 517,016,200 in total, and paid KRW 861,037,000 for the sale price pursuant to the instant sales contract, and the Plaintiff completed the registration of transfer of ownership due to the instant sales contract as the receipt on February 15, 2019 by the Namyang-gu District Court of the Republic of Korea (No. 12636, Feb. 15, 2019).

No. 11 of the first instance court's decision is difficult to say "no. 10"

The defendant shall serve as the representative of Q Q Co., Ltd. for the purpose of advertising production in the building sector.